Prabodha Nanda Mahar v. Uco Bank And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

I.A. No. 13720 of 2022 in W.P.(C) No. 19218 of 2012 Prabodha Nanda ....

Petitioner Mr. Samir Kumar Mishra, Advocate -versusU.C.O. Bank, Bhubaneswar & Another ....

Opposite Parties Mr. Utkal Keshari Mohapatra, Proxy Counsel on behalf of Mr. B.B. Swain, Advocate for Bank

CORAM:

JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN ORDER (Oral) 12.10.2022 I.A. No. 13720 of 2022 Order No.

12.

This matter is taken up by virtual/physical mode. 1.

In the aforesaid writ petition disposed of on 24th September, 2022, the I.A. has been filed seeking correction of the name of the counsel for the parties which appear to have been inadvertently not correctly recorded.

2.

In view of the aforesaid limited prayer, the I.A. is allowed and it is ordered that the name of Mr. Samir Kumar Mishra, Advocate be recorded as the counsel for the Petitioner and

// 2 // Mr. B.B. Swain, Advocate in place of Mr. D.P. Sarangi, Advocate as the counsel for the Bank/Opposite Parties. (Jaswant Singh) Judge (M.S. Raman) Judge Laxmikant October 12, 2022 Cuttack