Chanda Parasramka v. Dy.Dir.Revenueesi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 23152 of 2013 Chanda Parasramka ....

Petitioner Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate -versusDeputy Director (Revenue) ESIC ....

Opposite Party Mr. P.P. Ray, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

07.09.2022 Order No.

04.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Party.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no instruction.

4.

Mr. P.P. Ray, learned counsel for the Opposite Party appeared on behalf of the E.S.I.C.

5.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as no instruction, giving liberty to the petitioner to file afresh if any cause of action survives. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Ayesha