Manoranjan Dhal v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No.38 of 2022 (Through Video Conferencing mode) Manoranjan Dhal ....

Petitioner Mr. A.C.Behera, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. D.Mund, Addl. Govt. Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order No.

ORDER

25.01.2022 01.

1.

Mr. Behera, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, in spite of orders made by civil Court and confirmed by the Supreme Court, private opposite party is not vacating and delivering possession of the property. When his client wanted possession, he was assaulted. He lodged complaint with the local police and thereafter wrote to the Superintendent of Police but no steps have been taken.

2.

Mr. Mund, learned advocate, Addl. Govt. Advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, the dispute is civil in nature.

3.

Petitioner must seek remedy for execution of decree. It goes without saying that the police must be vigilant and see that no breach of the peace takes place.

// 2 // 4.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge RKS