Chandra Sekhar Sahoo v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.746 of 2022 Chandra Sekhar Sahoo ....

Petitioners Mr. S.D. Das, Sr. Advocate -versusState of Odisha & Ors.

....

Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Panda, Addl. Govt. Adv.

Mr. B. Routray, Sr. Adv. being assisted by Ms. M. Panda, Adv.

CORAM:

JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH

ORDER

16.02.2022 Order No.

02.

1.

This writ petition is filed with an allegation of nonconsideration of the objection of the Petitioner in the process of finalization of the reservation list as appearing at Annexure-6. 2.

Mr. Das, learned Sr. Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that Petitioner has submitted his objection on 01.01.2022 before the Collector, Jajpur and there has been no service of outcome.

3.

Considering the submission made by Mr. Das, learned Sr. Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, this Court observes, if the Petitioner has already submitted his objection before the Collector, Jajpur within appropriate time, the same is required to be

// 2 // considered by the Collector before making final publication of the reservation list. This Court finds, this writ petition becomes premature at this stage. In the process this Court directs, in the event the State-authorities are already in receipt of the objection of the Petitioner vide Annexure-5 and there is outcome, they must supply a copy of the outcome thereon to the Petitioner within a period of three days from the date of communication of an authenticated copy of this order by the Petitioner. It is also made clear that basing on such outcome, if the Petitioner is so advised, may re-approach the Court with proper grounds.

4.

The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. 5.

Free copy of this order be handed over to the learned State Counsel for communication purpose.

(Biswanath Rath) Judge Ayaskanta Jena