Pradip Ku.Naik v. G.M.East Coast Rly.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No.18867 of 2013 (Through Hybrid mode) Pradip Kumar Naik and another ....

Petitioners Mr. J. K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versusG.M. East Coast Railway and another ....

Opposite Parties Ms. B. Sahoo, Central Government Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order No.

ORDER

22.06.2022 07.

1.

Mr. Mohapatra, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioners, who are the son and daughter-in-law of the deceased. Death was by railway accident. He submits, there be same direction for payment of compensation, as covered by order made this day in WP(C) no.18866 of 2013 (Pratima @ P. Nayak and another v. G.M. East Coast Railway and another). 2.

Ms. Sahoo, learned advocate appears on behalf of Union of India (railways).

3.

This writ petition is covered by order dated 22nd June, 2022 in Pratima @ P.Nayak (supra). There will be same direction for the compensation to be paid within four weeks of

// 2 // communication.

4.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge RKS