Sudam Ch.Sethi v. Comnr,Women And Child

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 7239 of 2010 Sudam Chandra Sethi .....

Petitioner Mr. S. Nanda, Advocate Vs.

Commnr.-cum-Secy., Women & Child Development Deptt. & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

ORDER

05.01.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he has no instructions in the matter, since it is an year old matter. Therefore, the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned, if any cause of action still survives.

3.

Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Additional Government Advocate stated that it is a tender matter and the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.

4.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Alok ...........................

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE .....................................

(S.K. PANIGRAHI) JUDGE