Maguni Ch.Kamala v. East Coast Rail Way

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.17203 of 2014 Maguni Charana Kamala ....

Petitioner Mr. Neelakantha Panda, Adv.

-versusEast Cost Railways and Ors.

....

Opp. Parties Mr. A.K. Mishra, Sr. Adv.

(for O.P. Nos.1 to 3) Mr. L.N. Patel, Adv.

(for O.P. No.4)

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

ORDER

07.02.2022 Order No.

03.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.

3. Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party nos.1 to 3 and Mr. L.N. Patel, learned counsel for the opposite party no.4 are present.

4. Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party nos.1 to 3 contended that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

5. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge ( S.K. Panigrahi) Judge BJ