Nitish Ku.Agarwal v. Asst.Dir.Of Revenue

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.21468 of 2012 (Through hybrid mode) Nitish Kumar Agarwal ....

Petitioner None -versusAssistant Director of Revenue, ESI Corporation and another ....

Opposite Parties Mr. P.P. Ray, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order No.

ORDER

16.12.2022 8.

1.

None appears on behalf of petitioner.

2. Same situation prevailed on 6th December, 2022. Order made that day is reproduced below.

"1. None appears on behalf of petitioner.

2. Mr. Ray, learned advocate appears on behalf of Revenue.

3. Order-sheet reveals co-ordinate Bench had directed issuance of notice and interim measure by order dated 7th January, 2013, after which petitioner did not appear to prosecute the writ petition.

4. It is made clear, in event petitioner continues to go unrepresented on adjourned date or thereafter, the writ petition will be dismissed.

// 2 //

5. List on 15th December, 2022.

3.

The writ petition is dismissed.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Sks