Satrughna Sahoo v. Mihir K. Pattnaik

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CONTC No.2261 of 2009 Satrughana Sahoo and Others ....

Petitioners Mr. Shakti Sekhar, Proxy counsel on behalf of Mr. B. Routray, Advocate -versusMihir Kumar Pattanaik and Others ....

Contemnors/Opp.Parties Mr. A.K. Nanda, AGA

CORAM:

JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN ORDER (Oral) 14.03.2022 04.

1. This matter is taken up through virtual/physical mode. Order No.

2. It is claimed that the interim order dated 27th June, 2003 restraining the eviction of the petitioner from the land in question has been violated.

3. At the time of hearing, learned proxy counsel for the petitioner prays for disposal of the present contempt as not pressed.

4. In view of the above, the CONTC is dismissed as not pressed.

(Jaswant Singh) Judge (M. S. Raman) Judge March 14th, 2022 Cuttack/Basudev