Harish Raithatha v. East Coast Railway

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 3092 of 2008 Harish Raithatha ....

Petitioner Mr. S.P. Patra, Advocate -versusEast Coast Railway, Sambalpur and Others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. B.S. Rayaguru, Central Government Counsel

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK

ORDER

09.02.2022 04.

1. This is a petition questioning the award of tender to Opposite Order No.

Party No.3. There is an interim order passed by this Court on 4th March, 2008 directing that if the work order has not been issued in favour of Opposite Party No.3, the same shall not be issued without the leave of this Court. That interim order has continued since then.

2. It is obvious that the cause of action for the Petitioner does not survive any longer since either a fresh tender must have been issued in view of the above stay or if the work order had already been issued the work must have been completed by now.

3. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge S.K. Jena/P.A.