Rabindra Ku.Jena v. State

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.12966 of 2014 Rabindra Kumar Jena ....

Petitioner Mr. K.P. Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. B. Mohanty, Standing Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

ORDER

06.01.2022 06.

1. The matter is taken up through hybrid mode. Order No.

2. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.

3. Heard Mr. B. Mohanty, learned Standing Counsel for the School and Mass Education Department.

4. The petitioner files this writ petition to quash the Tender Call Notice dated 09.07.2014 under Annexure-3.

5. Learned Standing Counsel for the School and Mass Education Department contended that the period of tender has already been expired and therefore by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

// 2 //

6. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (DR. B.R. Sarangi) Judge (S.K. Panigrahi) Judge pcd