Madan Mohan Mohanty v. State And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 3587 of 2012 Madan Mohan Mohanty .....

Petitioner Mr. S. Pradhan, Advocate Vs.

State of Orissa & Others .....

Opposite parties Mr. S.N. Nayak, A.S.C.

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

15.03.2022 Order No.

04.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Learned Addl. Standing Counsel states that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. 3.

In view of such submission, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. However, if any cause of action survives, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

Alok /Sukanta ...........................

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE .....................................

(SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE