Union Of India v. Amiya Sahoo

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 9830 of 2005 Union of India and others .....

Petitioner Mr. P.K. Parhi, ASGI Vs.

Amiya Sahoo and others .....

Opposite Parties Mr. B.N. Tripathy, Adv. on behalf of Mr.K.C.Kanungo, Adv.[O.P.No.1]

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA

ORDER

26.07.2022 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

Order No.

06.

2.

None appears for the Petitioners at the time of call. 3.

Heard Mr. B.N. Tripathy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. K.C. Kanungo, learned Counsel for Opposite Party No.1. 4.

Perused the record. The Union of India and its functionaries have this Writ Petition seeking following relief: "For the reasons stated above, the Petitioner humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:- (i) Admit the application, call for and after hearing the counsel for the parties issue writ in the nature of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ/s and/or order/s as your Lordship therein fit and proper and (ii) Pass such other order/orders as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case."

5.

The aforesaid prayer made by the Petitioners does not make out a case in favour of the Petitioners to consider the same. Accordingly, the Writ Petition merits no consideration and the same is hereby dismissed.

Ashok/Padma (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE