Shyama S.Maharana v. S.P.Puri

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPCRL No.37 of 2013 Sri Shyama Sundar Maharana .........

Petitioner Mr. B. Mohapatra, Adv.

-VersusSuperintendent of Police, Puri & another .......... Opp. Parties Mr. J.P. Patnaik, Government Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO

ORDER

02.08.2022 Order No.

03.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/ Physical Mode).

2.

Heard Mr. B. Mohapatra, learned counsel appearing on instruction of Mr. A.K. Mohapatra-1, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for the subsequent event, this petition has become infructuous.

3.

Mr. J.P. Patnaik, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State has not contradicted that statement. 4.

Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous. (S. Talapatra) Judge (M.S. Sahoo) Judge Subhasis