Pitabasa Sai v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 1734 of 2022 Pitabasa Sai .....

Petitioner Mr. S.K. Pal, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

22.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite party No.3 for sanction/fixation of pay in existing promotional pay band and grade pay, i.e. PB-II (9300-34800) G.P. Rs. 4600/- in pay matrix level-10 attached to the promotional post as per MACP entitlement and RACP Rule 2013 for the post of Asst. Fisheries Officer towards 2nd RACP on completion of 20 years of service with effect from 01.01.2013. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made a representation to opposite party No.3 vide Annexure-8 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, taking into consideration Annexure-1, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-8, taking into consideration Annexure-1, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)