Saroj Kumar Samal v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 1951 of 2022 Saroj Kumar Samal .....

Petitioner Mr.D.K. Mohanty, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

01.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. 2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the order under Annexure-6 and to direct the opposite parties to disburse the benefit under RACP scheme of grade pay of Rs.6600/- w.e.f. 31.01.2020 as 3rd RACP and GP of Rs.5400/- as 2nd RACP after completion of 20 years of service, i.e. 01.01.2013. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioners have made a representation to opposite party No.1 vide Annexure-10 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, taking into consideration Annexure-9, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-10, taking into consideration Annexure-9, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of

certified/authenticated copy this order.

6.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court's Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021, and Court's Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)