Trilochan Mohanty v. State

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 865 of 2010 Trilochan Mohanty ....

Petitioner Mr. P.K. Nanda, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. P. Mohapatra, ASC Mr. N.C. Panigrahi, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

15.07.2022 Order No.

04.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3.

The petitioner has assailed the advertisement contend in Annexure-7 regarding engagement of Management Training which relates to the year 2009 in (Annexure-7).

4.

Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.3 and learned senior counsel Mr. Panigrahi for Opposite Party No.2 and taking into account the recitals in the Writ application the same has rendered infructuous. 5.

According, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi