Ananda Baral v. Collector Khurdha And

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.11533 of 2013 Anand Barala ....

Petitioner Mr. B. Mohanty, Advocate -versusCollector, Khurda and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. A.K. Mishra, AGA

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE DR. B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

ORDER

05.01.2022 Order No.

3.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.

3. Heard Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Addl. Government Advocate.

4. Perused the record. The petitioner files this writ petition to declare the tender notification dated 20.03.2013 fixing the date of auction to 25.03.2013 as illegal, and to issue direction to the opposite parties to hold fresh auction of quarries mentioned at Sl No.1 to 31 of Annexure-1.

5. Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Addl. Government Advocate contended that the period of tender has already been over and by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

// 2 //

6. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

(DR. B.R. Sarangi) Judge (S.K. Panigrahi) Judge pcd