Ratnakar Jena v. O.P.T.C.L. And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 10441 of 2012 Ratnakar Jena .....

Petitioner Mr. P.K. Nayak-1, Advocate Vs.

Orissa Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. (OPTCL) & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties Ms. S. Pattnaik, Adv.

(For O.P.No.1) Mr. S. Udgata, Adv.

(For O.P. No.2)

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

19.04.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. 3.

Heard Ms. S. Pattnaik, learned counsel for opposite party No.1 and Mr. S. Udgata, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.2.

4.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite party nos.1 & 2 to release his outstanding dues with 12% interest, as the opposite party no.3 is not cooperating for the same, within a stipulated time. 5.

Since the dispute is between the petitioner-sub contractor and opposite party no.3-contractor, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. However, petitioner is at liberty to pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.

6.

With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Ashok/Puspa ...........................

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE .....................................

(SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE