B.Krushna v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.2287 OF 2022 B.Krushna .....

Petitioner Mr. S.N. Patnaik, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

27.01.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through conferencing mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the order of punishment under order dated 16.10.2020 under Annexure-10.

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made appeal to opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-11 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time.

5. Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-11 and pass appropriate order in accordance with

law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of authenticated copy of this order.

6. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court's notice no. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021, and Court's Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE