Pratik Kumar Roy v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No.2366 of 2022 Pratik Kumar Roy ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

THE JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI

ORDER

28.02.2022 01.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. Order No.

2. Heard leaned counsel for the parties.

3. The grievance of the Petitioner in this writ petition is that the power supply to the house of the Petitioner has not been given though inspection has been made. As such he has come to this Court seeking a mandamus to the opposite parties to give power supply on the basis of his application. But in the meanwhile the utility company has been taken over by the distribution company TPNODL. The Petitioner has made TPCODL as opposite parties 2 to 5, which the learned counsel stated to be an inadvertent typographical error. Therefore, he submits that a direction may be given to the distribution company to consider his application pending in this regard within a stipulated period.

// 2 //

4. Considering the limited grievance of the Petitioner, this Court without issuing notice to the distribution companyopposite parties taken over from the utility company NESCO to act on such application of the Petitioner, if the same is pending, putting a notice to the persons who have grievance if any on the same with regard to power supply and pass necessary order on the same within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order notwithstanding the inadvertent mistake of the cause title i.e. TPCODL instead of TPNODL.

5. With the aforesaid order, this writ petition stands disposed of.

6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(S. Pujahari) Judge PKS