Akhila Sahoo v. State And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 287 of 2013 Akhila Sahoo ....

Petitioner Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocate -versusState of Orissa & Others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. S.N. Pattnaik, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

16.11.2022 Order No.

05. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2.

None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called. 3.

Heard learned AGA, Mr. S.N. Pattnaik for the Opposite Parties.

4.

On perusal of the pleadings, it is seen that the petitioner has assailed his discharge as a Home Guard.

5.

It is on record that the petitioner preferred the appeal after lapse of 10 years for which the Appellate Authority did not consider the same.

6.

On going through the materials on record, this Court does not find any prima facie ground to exercise its power under Article 226 for entertaining the present Writ Petition. 7.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Ayesha