Purnachandra Nayak v. State And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.1455 of 2011 Sri Purnachandra Nayak ....

Petitioner Smt. Sujata Jena, Advocate -versusState of Orissa and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. A.P. Das, A.S.C.

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No.

ORDER

29.03.2022 06.

1. Considering that the impugned order of the Additional Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar dated 20th May 2002 in W.L. Case No.763/70 and M.C. No.869/2000 is an appealable one, learned counsel for the Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition to approach the appellate authority in accordance with law.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that she is not aware if the Petitioner, who was 78 years at the time of filing of the present petition, is still alive. The permission above granted is also available to the legal representatives of the Petitioner in such event.

3. If the appeal is filed not later than 2nd May 2022 accompanied by an application of condonation of delay citing the pendency of the present petition as a reason for delay, it will be considered on merits by the appellate authority. The status quo order passed by this Court on 6th August 2012 will continue till such time the

appellate authority passes an appropriate order on an application for interim relief to be filed along with the appeal within aforementioned time.

4. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

5. Urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge S.K. Guin