Prasanna Ku.Parhi v. Benudhar Das

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CONTC No.761 of 2016 Prasanna Kumar Padhi ....

Petitioner Mr. Dillip Ray, Advocate -versusBenudhar Das, Director, Secondary Education, Orissa, Bhubaneswar, District-Khurda ....

Contemnor/ Opposite Party Mr. Biswajit Mohanty, Standing Counsel, School & Mass Education Department

CORAM:

JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN Order No.

ORDER (Oral) 24.09.2022 06.

This matter is taken up through virtual/physical mode.

1. Learned counsel for the Contemnor points out that in compliance of the order dated 30.07.2012 passed in W.P.(C) No.2146 of 2012, the Director, Secondary Education, Odisha has decided the appeal of the petitioner vide order dated 10.05.2018, qua which the petitioner has availed his remedy by filing W.P.(C) No.9041 of 2018 which has also been disposed of vide order dated 24.05.2018.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that in view of the order dated 30.07.2012 having been complied with, as stated above, the present contempt has become infructuous.

// 2 // 3.

The CONTC is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.

(Jaswant Singh) Judge (M. S. Raman) Judge AKK September 24th, 2022 Cuttack