Abhinash@Asu Mittali @Agrawal v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMC No. 99 OF 2021 Abhinash @ Asu Mittali @ Agrawal ...........

Petitioner Mr. Manoj Verma, Adv.

-versusState of Odisha & another ............

Opposite Parties Mr. D.Mund,AGA Mr. T.K.Mishra, Adv. For O.P. No. 2

CORAM:

JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

2.05.2022 Order No.

08.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.

An affidavit has been filed by the informant (Opp. Party No.2) in Court today and the same is taken on record. It has been stated in paragraph-3 thereof that the informant does not want to proceed with the case further.

4.

For convenience, paragraph-3 of the said affidavit is quoted hereunder.

"3. That, since a family settlement was made between us and I don't want to proceed with the case further. As continuance of proceeding will be hamper of our family life."

5.

Taking note of the aforesaid affidavit and the nature of allegations and in tune with the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. Vrs. The State of Gujarat and Anr., reported in AIR 2017 SC 4843, the proceeding in connection with C.T. Case No. 304 of 2016 arising out of Deogarah P.S. Case No. 111 of 2016, on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Deogarh, stands quashed in respect of the Petitioner in exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

6.

Accordingly, the CRLMC stands disposed of.

7.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

( V.Narasingh ) Judge Dhal