Birendra Nayak v. S.P.Dhenkanal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPCRL No. 12 of 2018 Birendra Nayak ......

Petitioner Mr. G.S. Mohanty, Advocate -versusSuperintendent of Police, Dhenkanal and Ors.

......

Opp. Parties Mrs. S. Patnaik, AGA

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

04.07.2022 Order No.

07.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

None appears for the Petitioner when the matter is called out.

3.

Mr. S. Patnaik, learned Additional Government Advocate appears for the State.

4.

From the nature of prayer made in this petition, it appears that the Petitioner was apprehensive of security for the contemplate acts of the Respondents. Within these four years, no report has been placed in the Court that any untoward incident violating the security of the Petitioner has taken place. Moreover, there is no representation for the Petitioner today. Hence, this petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution. (S. Talapatra) Judge (B.P. Routray) Judge Murmu