C.D.A.,Cuttack v. Niranjan Bal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.A. No. 400 of 2016 Cuttack Development Authority and another ....

Appellants Mr. Sanjib Swain, Advocate -versusNiranjan Bal ....

Respondent Mr. Aurovinda Mohanty, Advocate

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN

ORDER

19.12.2022 Order No.

02.

1. All that the impugned order does is to require the Appellant to recalculate the interest amount, and if any refund is due to the Respondent, to refund the amount to him.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the Appellant when repeatedly asked, why the impugned order has not been implemented, simply states that the Respondent has not approached the Appellant for its implementation. No point is able to be made by the Appellant before the Court as to why the Court should interfere with that order at all. On his part learned counsel appearing for the Respondent states that the Appellant has been approached way back on 10th August, 2016. However, after that date, the Respondent does not seem to have pursued the matter.

3. In the above circumstances, the Court sees no reason why it should interfere in the matter. The writ appeal is dismissed. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge S. Behera