Muralidhar Maharana v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.15582 of 2017 Muralidhar Maharana ....

Petitioner(s) Mr. L. Mishra, Advocate -versusState of Orissa & Anr.

....

Opposite Party(s) Mr. U.K. Sahoo, Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH

ORDER

20.09.2022 08.

1.

This Writ Petition involves the following prayer:- Order No.

"Therefore it is humbly prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue rule nissi, calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the opposite party no 2 shall not be directed to comply with the order dtd. 31.12.2013 passed by the Mutation Officer, Dasapalla in Mutation Case no. 1340 of 2013 (as per Annexure1), and further be pleased to direct the opposite party no 2 to issue R.O.R of the land (i.e. Mouza Kunjabanagarh, Hal Mouza-Jagapur Dist.-Nayagarh, Sabik Khata No. 358/Ka corresponding to Hal Khata No 131 and Sabik Plot No 1996 corresponding to Hal Plot no 134 admeasuring Ac. 0.40) in favour of the present petitioner after making necessary corrections in a stipulated time as would be granted by this Hon'ble Court, and causes shown insufficient, be pleased to make the said rule absolute;

And pass any other order/ orders as it may deem fit and proper;"

// 2 // 2.

Considering the submissions made by the parties, this Court finds, the Writ Petition simply involves a request for working out of the order passed by the competent authority in Mutation Case No.1340 of 2013. This Court finds, there is already adjudication of the proceeding under the Mutation Manual by passing the order at Annexure-1. There has already been a direction by the Mutation Authority to prepare the record of rights in the manner disclosed therein. There is no controversy in the direction of the authority. This Court here records the statement of the learned counsel for Petitioner that there is even no further proceeding involving the order at Annexure-1 requiring to be worked out.

3.

In the circumstance this Court finds, there is unnecessary pendency of the Writ Petition, which is hereby disposed of with a direction to the Opposite Party No.2 to work-out the order under Annexure-1 by bringing necessary record of rights as per the impugned order within a period of fifteen days from the date of production of the copy of this order. There shall also be an arrangement for uploading the correct record of rights in the Website also. Petitioner seeks coverage of a direction of this Court in similar situation. Petitioner, if so advised, may produce copy of such order while serving copy of this order to the Opposite Party No.2 for his consideration in working out the direction hereinabove.

4.

The writ petition stands disposed of with the above order. (Biswanath Rath) Judge Ayaskanta Jena