Dharma Padhi v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.3818 OF 2022 Dharma Padhi .....

Petitioner Mr. D. Ray, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

09.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties no.1 & 2 to consider his grievance with regard to mutual transfer to Kotpad N.A.C. from Banapur N.A.C.

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-4 series and the same may be directed to be considered taking into consideration Annexure-5 within a stipulated time to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5. As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite

party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 series and pass appropriate order taking into consideration Annexrue-5 within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE