Tushara Kanta Sahoo v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P(C) No.3939 OF 2022 Tushara Kanta Sahoo .....

Petitioner Mr. C.R. Pattnaik, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

15.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to recommend his name along with 9 others for recruitment to the post of Attendant in the concerned office forthwith preferably within a stipulated period.

4. As it appears, the petitioner has not impleaded those nine persons as parties to the writ petition for whom he has made prayer before this Court. Nothing has been placed on record to that effect.

Therefore, in course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file better writ petition with better particulars.

4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn granting liberty as aforesaid.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE