Sukanta Kumar Mantry v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 3955 of 2022 Sukanta Kumar Mantri .....

Petitioner Mr. K.C. Sahu, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

10.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. 2.

Heard Mr. K.C. Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties no.3 & 4 to sanction and disburse his withheld annual periodical increments in respect of the petitioner fallen from January 2018 to till date along with fixation/revision of pay as peer ORSP Rules, 2017 along with all consequential service and differential financial benefits keeping in view of the provision of Rules-77 of Odisha Service Code so also similar decision taken as per Annexue-6 series within a stipulated period.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before opposite party no.4 highlighting the grievances, and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time taking into consideration Annexure-6 series.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, but, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioner, with regard to the grievance made in this petition, files a fresh comprehensive representation before opposite party no.4 within ten days hence, the same shall be considered by the said authority taking into consideration Annexure-6 series and pass appropriate order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation along with the certified copy of this order.

6.

With the above observation and direction, the writ petition is dispose of.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE