Nityananda Panda v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.1647 of 2021

1. Nityananda Panda

2. Smt. Binodini Panda

3. Sirshananda Panda ....

Petitioners Mr.D.K. Panda, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opp. Party Mr.A.K. Beura, Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No.

ORDER

09.02.2022 03.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Learned counsel for the State on instruction submitted that no first information report has been registered against any of the petitioners.

In view of such submission, since there is no F.I.R. in the case and there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioners, I am not inclined to entertain the anticipatory bail application under section 438 of Cr.P.C. The petitioners are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy after the registration of the F.I.R.

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

// 2 // The interim order dated 08.03.2021 stands vacated.

P ( S.K. Sahoo) Judge