Kambhu Behera v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 4307 of 2018 Kambhu Behera and Others ....

Petitioners Mr. Ranjan Kumar Rout, Advocate -versusUnion of India and Others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, Addl. Govt. Advocate Mr. P.K. Pattnaik, Advocate Mr. Suvashis Pattnaik, Advocate

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order No.

ORDER

12.09.2022 20.

1. If there is any violation of any Regulations or Guidelines then the Petitioner has to be specific as to which of those guidelines has been violated. Secondly, if there is any health risk to the villagers, the Petitioner has to be specific what type of health risk has been caused on account of the Mobile Tower being erected in the land of Opposite Party No.9. The petition does neither.

2. Consequently, the Court is not inclined to interfere at this stage in the present form of the petition. The Petitioners are nevertheless permitted to agitate their grievance in proper manner first to the authorities and then after following up on such grievance to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

3. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge S.K. Jena/Secy.