Susmit Kumar Prusty v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 4163 of 2022 Susmit Kumar Prusty .....

Petitioner Mr. Rajjeet Roy, Advocate - VersusState of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opp. Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

11.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite party no.2 to consider the case of the petitioner for reengagement in the post of Road Roller Driver/ Driver lying vacant in the office of the District Rural Development Agency, Rayagada and regularize his service taking consideration his length of service rendered under the opposite parties.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time, to which learned State counsel has raised no objection. 5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 and pass

appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of authenticated/certified copy of this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE