Sridhar Barik v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.4436 OF 2022 Sridhar Barik .....

Petitioner Mr. Indramani Sahoo, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

15.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties no.1 & 2 to regularize his services on completion of ten years of service as he has appointed prior to 12.04.1993 in view of Finance Department Resolution dated 15.05.1997 with all consequential service benefits.

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-7 and the same may be directed to be disposed of keeping in view the judgments of the apex Court in Secretary State of Karnataka and Others v. Umadevi (3) and Others (2006) 4 SCC 1 and State of Karnataka and others v.

M.L.Keshari and others, (2010) 9 SCC 247.

5. Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-7 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law keeping in view the ratio decided by the apex Court in Umadevi & M.L. Keshari (supra) as well as Amarkanti Rai v. State of Bihar and others, (2015) 8 SCC 265 within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.