Srikanta Routray v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 5093 of 2022 Srikanta Routray .....

Petitioner Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

22.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to extend similar benefits of revised Rigman-cum-Pump Operator scale of pay of Rs.975-1660/- with effect from 05.12.1991 and subsequent pay revisions under ORSP Rules, 1998, 2008 and 2017. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made a representation to opposite party No.2 vide Annexure-6 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, taking into consideration Annexures3, 4 and 5, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-6, taking into consideration Annexures-3, 4 and 5, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)