Prasanta Kumar Nayak v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 5245 of 2022 Prasanta Kumar Nayak and others .....

Petitioner Mr. K.K. Swain, Advocate Vs.

State of Orissa and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

25.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to renew the contractual engagement of the petitioners as Technical Consultants as per letter dated 10.02.2021 of the Project Director, DRDA, Mayurbhanj under Annexure-5. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioners have made a representation to opposite party No.1 vide Annexure-6 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioners vide Annexure-6, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)