Umakanta Mohanty @ Mantu v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.2260 of 2022

1. Umakanta Mohanty @ Petitioners ....

Mantu

2. Chandan @ Harihara Jena

3. Rajesh Das @ Pintu

4. Gangadhara Pani @ Babuli

5. Ramakanta Mohanty @ Madhia

6. Nalu @ Narahari Majhi

7. Tukuna @ Rohit @ Titua Das

8. Pradeep Pani @ Jaga

9. Chintamani Jena @ Dipankar

10. Amulya Kumar Barik

11. Gajendra Jena

12. Kalia @ Kalandi Jena

13. Biswaranjan Jena

14. Kalia @ Amulya Mohalik

15. Katia Bal Mr.J.K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opp. Party Mr. Arupananda Das, Addl. Government Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No.

ORDER

22.03.2022 01.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid

// 2 // arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Bansada P.S. Case No.74 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No.171 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Chandbali for alleged commission of offences under sections 452, 354-B, 323, 506, 427, 380/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Perused the F.I.R. annexed to the anticipatory bail application.

Learned counsel for the State on instruction submitted that notices as contemplated under section 41A of Cr.P.C. have been served on the petitioners and they have complied with the terms of the notice and therefore, there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioners in connection with this case. In view of such submission, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge PKSahoo