Manoj Kumar Bal v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.2389 of 2022 1.

Manoj Kumar Bal 2.

Umakanta Mohanty @ Mantu 3.

Gangadhara Pani @ Babuli 4.

Ramakanta Mohanty @ Madhia 5.

Ramesh @ Kera Bal 6.

Laxman Das 7.

Suka @ Krushna Das 8.

Nrusingha Chandra Jena 9.

Santosh @ Ramakanta Mohanty

10. Pradeep Pani @ Jaga

11. Chandan @ Harihara Jena

12. Dambaru Pani @ Sashikanta Pani

13. Gayadhara Pani @ Kartika Pani

14. Jalia @ Dolagobinda Barik

15. Biswaranjan Jena

16. Ramesh Jena

17. Kalia @ Amulya Mohalik

18. Bijay @ Sukuta Jena

19. Katia Bal

20. Brundaban Nath

21. Kalia Jena @ Kalandi ....

Petitioners Mr.J.K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opp. Party Mr. D.K. Pani, Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No.

ORDER

23.03.2022 01.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid

// 2 // arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Bansada P.S. Case No.88 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No.184 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Chandbali for alleged commission of offences under sections 294, 427, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Perused the F.I.R. annexed to the anticipatory bail application.

Learned counsel for the State on instruction submitted that notices as contemplated under section 41A of Cr.P.C. have been served on the petitioners and they have complied with the terms of the notice and therefore, there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioners in connection with this case. In view of such submission, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge PKSahoo