Balakrushna Panda v. State Of Maharashtra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPCRL No. 28 of 2021 Balakrushna Panda ........

Petitioner Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate -versusState of Maharashtra and Ors. ...... Opposite Parties.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO

ORDER

12.08.2022 Order No.

06.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Mr. A.B. Pattnaik, learned counsel appearing on instruction of Mr. S.S. Tripathy, learned counsel for the Petitioner has stated that there is no instruction from the Petitioner.

3.

In such circumstances, we are of the view that the writ petition shall be dismissed for non-prosecution. Accordingly, it is ordered.

4.

The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (S. Talapatra) Judge [ (M.S. Sahoo) Judge Murmu