Manoranjan Srichandan v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.6733 of 2022 Manoranjan Srichandan ....

Petitioner Mr. Sangram Rath, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. Y.S.P. Babu, A.G.A.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

11.04.2022 01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Perused the record.

3.

The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :- "In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be enough to issue/writ/writs, order/orders directing the opposite parties, particularly opposite party no.3 to take immediate steps on the basis of the representation of the petitioner in enabling the petitioner to discharge his duties as per Annexure2 and pass such other order/orders, as may be deemed fit and proper;"

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that although the petitioner has filed representation highlighting his grievances dated 25.02.2022 under Annexure-2 before the Assistant Registrar of Cooperative Society, Puri Circle, Puri-Opposite Party No.3, the same is still pending before the said Opposite parties and the said Opposite Parties have not taken any decision on the representation of the

// 2 // Petitioner as of now.

5.

Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties submits that he has no objection, if a direction is given to the authorities to consider the grievance petition of the petitioner in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time.

6.

Considering the limited nature of grievance of the petitioner, this Court disposes of the writ petition at the stage of admission with a direction to the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Society, Puri Circle, Puri-Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation of the petitioner 25.02.2022 under Annexure-2 in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Further the Opposite Party No.3 is directed to consider the representation of the Petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Any decision taken on the same shall be communicated to the Petitioner within a period of ten days thereafter. 7.

With the aforesaid direction/observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Jagabandhu