Kamala Choudhury v. State Of Odisha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No.496 of 2022 Kamala Choudhury ....
Petitioner Mr. S.K. Tripathy, Advocate -versusState of Odisha & others ....
Opp. Parties Mr. Sk. Zafarulla, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY Order No.
ORDER
02.05.2022 02.
1.
Heard Mr. Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Zafarulla, learned Additional Standing Counsel. 2.
At the outset, Mr. Tripathy is permitted to implead the Superintendent of Police (Rural), Cuttack as opposite party No.4 in this petition.
3.
According to Mr. Tripathy, the petitioner, who happens to be the informant is aggrieved by the non-registration of Baramba P.S. Case No.23 of 2022 under the appropriate provisions of law. According to Mr. Tripathy, the F.I.R. should also have been registered for commission of offences under Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 in the facts and circumstances of the case.
4.
During course of hearing, Mr. Tripathy submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to move the Superintendent of Police (Rural), Cuttack (opposite party No.4) in the matter by filing a grievance petition and the said opposite party be directed to take a decision on such motion within a
// 2 // specific time period.
5.
Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file a grievance petition before opposite party No.4 through registered post within a period of two weeks from today. In the event, such a petition is filed along with a certified copy of this order, the opposite party No.4 is directed to take a decision on the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such grievance petition and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.
6.
Accordingly, this CRLMP is disposed of.
7.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
Prasant ( Biswajit Mohanty) Judge