Vandana Vaishnav v. Siksha'O'Anusandhan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.22674 of 2013 Vandana Vaishnav and others ....

Petitioners Mr. P.K. Sahoo, Advocate -versusSiksha 'O' Anusandhan University and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. R.C. Mohanty, Advocate (for O.P. No.3)

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

ORDER

10.01.2022 Order No.

5.

1. This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.

2. None appears for the petitioners at the time of call.

3. Mr. R.Ch. Mohanty, learned counsel for the opposite party No.3 contended that since the counselling for admission in MBBS course is relating to the year, 2013, by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

4. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

5. As the restrictions due to resurgence of Covid-19 are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the Advocate concerned with his/her seal, in the manner prescribed vide Court's Notice

// 2 // No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020 and Court's Office Order dated 7th January, 2022.

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge (S.K. Panigrahi) Judge pcd