Anand Kumar v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMC No. 787 of 2020 Anand Kumar ....

Petitioner Mr. G.N. Mishra, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and another ....

Opposite Parties Ms. S. Mishra, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

20.04.2022 Order No.

03.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3.

An affidavit has been filed by the Opposite party No.2 indicating that the matter has been settled amicably out of Court. Paragraph-4 of the affidavit relevant for the present purpose is extracted herein under;

"4. That the matter has long since been settled through negotiation on intervention of our officers and I have no animosity against him. To restore amity and good will I do not want to proceed with the case any further. I have already submitted a Notarized Affidavit to that effect to the Capital P.S. for reference and doing needful."

4.

Taking into account such affidavit and in view of the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of Gujurat and another reported in AIR 2017 SC 4843, the proceeding in connection with C.T. Case No.6314 of 2019, on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar, arising out of Capital P.S. Case No.462 of 2019, stands quashed in respect of the present petitioners in exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 5.

The petitioners as well as the Opposite Parties are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsels. The self-attested copy of the Aadhar Card is kept on record. 6.

The CRLMC thus stands disposed of.

7.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per the rules.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi