M/S.Bhushan Steel Lt v. State And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No.9299 of 2014 M/s Bhusan Steel Limited and others .....

Petitioners Mr.P. Acharya, Sr. Advocate Vs.

State of Orissa and others .....

Opposite Parties Mr. S.N. Nayak, ASC (O.Ps. 1 and 2) Mr. B.S. Rayguru, CGC (O.P.3)

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

05.05.2022 Order No.

14.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. It is contended by learned Additional Standing Counsel that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. 3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, as infructuous. However, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioners are at liberty to pursue their remedy before the appropriate forum, if it so advised, in terms of agreement/DTCN, which is applicable to the petitioners.

Arun/Puspa (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE