← Library
Orissa High CourtABLAPL/3289/2022allowed

Khirabala Nayak v. State Of Odisha

2022-05-10Mr. Justice S.K.Sahoo3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.3289 of 2022

1. Smt. Khirabala Nayak

2. Ashok Mohakud

3. Sibaprasad Bhoi

4. Bhagirathi Mahakud

5. Laxmidhar Nayak

6. Purna Chdndra Mahakud

7. Murali Bhoi @ Muralidhar Bhoi

8. Ajay Kumar Bhoi @ Ajaya Bhoi

9. Duryodhan Mohakud

10. Dayanidhi Nayak

11. Manoj Kumar Bhoi @ Monaj Bhoi

12. Manas Kumar Bhoi @ Manasha Bhoi

13. Kailash Bhoi

14. Ratikanta Bhoi

15. Natabar Mahakud

16. Biswanath Bhoi ....

Petitioners Mr. S.N. Mishra, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opp. Party Mr. A. Das, Addl. Government Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No.

ORDER

10.05.2022

// 2 // This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement 01.

(video conferencing/physical mode).

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Bhandaripokhari P.S. Case No.109 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 670 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Bhadrak for commission of alleged offences under sections 452, 323, 294, 354, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Perused the F.I.R. annexed to the anticipatory bail application.

Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that it is a case and counter case, the offences are triable by Magistrate and on hearing the learned counsel for the State, I am inclined to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that they shall make themselves available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing any facts to the Courts or to the Investigating Officer.

Violation of any of the above conditions shall entail

// 3 // cancellation of bail.

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge p