Jayaram Pujahari v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 7856 of 2022 Jayram Pujahari .....

Petitioner Mr. P.C. Nayak, Adv.

Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties Mr. T. Patnaik, ASC

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

26.04.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to make payment of differential tax of GST calculated under Annexure-3 for the work "Construction and maintenance for five years of rural roads PMGSY (ADB Rural Connectivity Investment Programme) for package no. OR-28ADB-88/Batch-I, RCIP-2/Tr-1 vide Agreement No. ADB 09 F2 of 2017-18 under Annexure-1 within a stipulated time. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already made representation before opposite party no.4-Chief Engineer, PMGSY, Bhubaneswar, Odisha vide Annexure-4 series, and the same may be directed to be disposed of taking into consideration the letter dated 06.06.2018 and also recommendation made by the competent authority vide Annexure3 within a stipulated time, to which learned Additional Standing Counsel has no objection.

5.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on

the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.4 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 series and pass appropriate order taking into consideration the letter dated 06.06.2018 and also recommendation made by the competent authority vide Annexure3 in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Ashok/Puspa (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE