M/S.Rudrapriya And Company v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) NO. 9029 OF 2020 M/s. Rudrapriya and Company ....

Petitioner Mr. A. Sahoo, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and others ....

Opp. Parties Mr. A.R. Dash, Additional Government Advocate (For Opp. Party No.1) Mr. B.S. Tripathy, Advocate (For Opp. Party No.6)

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

06.12.2022 3.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The Petitioner in this writ petition prays for a direction to the Opposite Party Nos. 3 to 5 to supply electricity to the premises of the Petitioner-Company.

3.

Both Mr. Sahoo, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Tripathy, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.6 submit that power supply to the premises of the Petitioner-Company has already been restored in the meantime. In that view of the matter, this writ petition has become infructuous. 4.

In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

5.

In view of the interim order dated 13th March, 2020 passed in I.A. No.3932 of 2020, the Opposite Party No.6-

// 2 // Company is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum for rerdressal of its grievances.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge bks