Abhimanyu Tarei v. E.E.,Balugan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 9660 of 2014 Abhimanyu Tarei ....

Petitioner Mr. G.P. Samal, Advocate -versusE.E., Balugan & Another ....

Opposite Parties Mr. B.K. Nayak(1), Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

21.09.2022 Order No.

04.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called. 3.

The matter relates to regularization, this Court is of prima facie view that with efflux of time, the same has been rendered infrutuous.

4.

The Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution, giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer, if cause of action survives.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge Ayesha