Dr.Son Pattnaik v. State Of Odisha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) Nos.8065, 8844, 8873, 8905 & 9852 of 2022 In W.P.(C) No.8065 of 2022 Dr. Son Pattnaik & Ors.
....
Petitioners Mr. Avijit Mishra, Adv.
-versusState of Odisha and Ors.
....
Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Samal, AGA (for O.P.1) Mr. R.C. Mohanty, Adv.
(for O.P. No.2-DMET) Ms. Pami Rath, Adv.
(for Interveners) In W.P.(C) No.8844 of 2022 Dr. Sibangi Patnaik & Ors.
....
Petitioners Mr. Avijit Mishra, Adv.
-versusState of Odisha and Ors.
....
Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Samal, AGA (for O.P.1) Mr. R.C. Mohanty, Adv.
(for O.P. No.2-DMET) Ms. Pami Rath, Adv.
(for Interveners) In W.P.(C) No.8873 of 2022 Dr. Sujata Sahoo & Ors.
....
Petitioners Mr. Madan Sundar Behera, Adv.
-versusState of Odisha and Ors.
....
Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Samal, AGA (for O.P.1) Mr. R.C. Mohanty, Adv.
(for O.P. No.2-DMET) Ms. Pami Rath, Adv.
(for Interveners)
// 2 // In W.P.(C) No.8905 of 2022 Dr. Satya Ranjan Acharya & Ors.
....
Petitioners Mr. Madan Sundar Behera, Adv.
-versusState of Odisha and Ors.
....
Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Samal, AGA (for O.P.1) Mr. R.C. Mohanty, Adv.
(for O.P. No.2-DMET) Ms. Pami Rath, Adv.
(for Interveners) In W.P.(C) No.9852 of 2022 Dr. Nihar Ranjan Mohanty & Ors.
....
Petitioners Mr. Pratik Dash, Adv.
-versusState of Odisha and Ors.
....
Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Samal, AGA (for O.P.1) Mr. R.C. Mohanty, Adv.
(for O.P. No.2-DMET) Ms. Pami Rath, Adv.
(for Interveners)
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order No.
ORDER
16.05.2022 10.
1. These matters are taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. Learned counsels for the petitioners an opposite parties in all the aforesaid Writ Petitions are present. Judgment prepared in separate sheets is delivered
// 3 // and pronounced in open Court in the presence of learned counsels for the parties and the order is passed accordingly as follows:-
3. The aspirational trajectory of the petitioners are worth appreciating but considering the stipulations in the advertisement and post-PG based SR certificate to be offered to them during their current postings, fails to convince this Court for granting any relief. This Court appreciates their service to the people and fire in the belly to strive high in their vocation. However, in view of the discussion made hereinabove, the Opposite Party No.2/ DMET to redraw the merit list of the selected SRs by excluding the petitioners and publish the result within three days from receipt of the copy of this order. Accordingly, the earlier order dated 05.04.2022 passed in I.A. No.4168 of 2022 arising out of W.P.(C) No.8065 of 2022, order dated 07.04.2022 passed in I.A. No.4589 of 2022 arising out of W.P.(C) No.8844 of 2022 and order dated 07.04.2022 passed in I.A. No.4611 of 2022 arising out of W.P.(C) No.8873 of 2022 are vacated and the Writ Petitions are dismissed.
4. All the aforesaid Writ Petitions are, accordingly, disposed of as dismissed.
5. Consequently all the pending I.As. are disposed of.
( S.K. Panigrahi) Judge BJ